Reply received by fax and postal mail from Maria Mercurio, CEO of RSPCA in answer to Patty's email:
7 September 2006
Patty Mark
President
Animal Liberation Victoria
394 Russell Street
Melbounre 3000
By facsimile: 9639 2993
Dear Patty,
I am responding to your emailed letter addressed to Dr Wirth regarding our upcoming Gala Ball.
As I'm sure you are aware, the RSPCA is not opposed to the use of animals as long as they are treated humanely. As well as enforcing the law via our Inspectors, the RSPCA lobbies governments, and attempts to inform and educate people in order to influence governments and the community at large about issues such as intensive farming, live exports, use of sow stalls, long distance transportation of animals, cat cruelty - and a further list too long to include here.
We believe this is the most effective way to bring about change and can point to a number of successes during the course of our 135 year history in Victoria and indeed, Australia. A vegan or vegetarian lifestyle is not what the RSPCA is all about. However, at all of our events where food is served, vegetarian options are always presented - it's an issue of free choice for individuals. We accept that Animal Liberation has a very different stance - but we don't publically protest because of those differences. We use our resources and energies to lobby governments and work to change industry and community practices which are cruel, not to target other organisations.
We know that ALV will continue to attend RSPCA events in Victoria and target our staff, volunteers and guests. We are continually asked why ALV don't hold their own events if they truly wish to get wide attention for their issues; why don't they lobby governments and why don't they try to influence industry, instead of targeting the RSPCA?
Many of our supporters, volunteers and some of our staff have previously supported ALV but more and more they are telling us that they no longer support you due to your campaign of targetting the RSPCA.
Your letter indicates that you intend to stage a protest outside the venue for our World Animal Day celebration. While you say it will be a peaceful protest and that you will not enter the venue, it is difficult for us to believe that considering the attack on Hugh Wirth at this same function in 2004. You also say that his safety and well being is of prime concern to you. If this was true then the attack on Dr Wirth would not have happened and you would understand the impact that had not only on him but on all of our staff and volunteers who now feel unsafe at our events.
In addition to attending our events and making people feel unsafe, your campaign of misinformation in regards to the Tolmie horses resulted in threats to RSPCA Inspectors. The Inspectors have a very difficult role and often face aggressive and threatening behaviour from alleged perpetrators of cruelty. Two of our Inspectors have in the past suffered injuries from direct attacks, resulting in the death of one. To receive threats due to a campaign of misinformation from another animal welfare organisation is just tragic.
While our organisations have different philosophies, I had thought that we at the very least shared a genuine interest in longer term animal welfare improvements. We are, however, again disappointed by your behaviour as you continue to target the RSPCA and it's President rather than the law makers who have the power to enact better, stronger legislation. We can never be equals around the table and enter into constructive dialogue while you continue to employ disruptive, often illegal tactics, and issue the RSPCA with ultimatums and veiled threats. And now you intend to demonstrate outside the venue for our major World Animal Day event - and on what issue? The issue is - we are not vegans or vegetarians and intend to give our diners a choice. Your "genuine goodwill for all" rings very hollow.
Yours sincerely
signed Maria Mercurio
Maria Mercurio
Chief Executive Officer |